HOW’S
THE MERGER OF BRITISH AIRWAYS AND IBERIA FINALLY ABLE TO CAPTURE SIGNIFICANT PROFIT IN
2013
British Airways and
Spain's Iberia announced in November 2009 a preliminary agreement for a $7
billion merger to create the world's third-largest airline by revenue. The deal
that was close by the end of 2010 ends the British flag carrier's long pursuit
of Iberia to create an enlarged group, to able to cope with the industry's
largest decline in decades. The deal will create a new holding company, which
will own the two airlines. In 2011 International Airlines Group (IAG) was
formed by the merger of British Airways and Iberia. The merge resulted in two
airlines joining forces in all-stock transaction.
Since the merger Iberia
kept pushing the IAG deep into the red zone. It occurred because the Spanish
national carrier has battled against recession, high unemployment and
competition from low-cost rivals. In May 2013 IAG unveiled a €670m pre-tax loss
for the first three months of the year. Mostly it is due to €311m of
exceptional charges, predominantly related to the restructuring of Iberia,
which is laying off more than 3,000 staff. Iberia made operating losses of more
than €200m during the period as the carrier continued to struggle against
Spain’s deep recession, which has pushed unemployment to a record 27%. By
contrast, BA made losses of £58m.
The huge loss margin
between British Airways and Iberia showed how unbalance is the companies inside
IAG. Unlike Air France and KLM which both of them are competitive in full
service carriers, Iberia as a national airline is not competitive enough in the
market. They are even not able to compete with Ryanair, Easyjet, and other Spanish
low cost airlines. IAG have to come with bright plan to overcome this issue and
some significant actions need to be done by IAG if they aim to return to the
profit.
After suffering huge
loss IAG executed a restructuring plan on Iberia. Iberia, whose performance has
dragged on the group since the merger with BA in 2011, had made progress
narrowing its loss by £153million to £137million. This has been achieved
through cost-cuts, including thousands of job losses, and reducing unprofitable
Latin American routes to destinations such Havana, Cuba. Iberia's restructuring
saw 2,500 staff leave the airline under a voluntary redundancy program, while
salaries were reduced by between 11% and 18%. As a result, Iberia's employee
costs were down 14.3% for the year. The pay and productivity agreements between
Iberia and its pilot and cabin crew unions that they were made are also the key
to reducing the airline's costs further and providing the foundation for
profitable growth. As a result Cost-cutting and productivity improvements at
Iberia had contributed to a healthy share price for IAG.
IAG’s new low cost
operation Vueling, which it bought last year and competes with Ryanair and EasyJet,
had also performed well in Europe. Acquiring low cost Spanish carrier Vueling
is a brilliant move that was done by IAG in 2013. Vueling never suffered a loss
in the last 5 years and their revenue always gone up tremendously since 2008.
It was brilliant acquisition since Vueling is main threat for Iberia before the
company was acquired by IAG in 2013.
British Airways profit climbed
up to £651million from £274million boosted by a growth in “premium” passengers
as businessmen took more flights to the US and Asia as the economy recovered.
In addition, more take-off and landing slots at Heathrow as a result of its BMI
takeover in 2012 also helped as did more flights on bigger planes such as the
A380 Superjumbo. As a result AIG turned around 2012’s
€774 million (£635 million) loss to post a pre-tax profit of €227 million per 31
December 2013.
However, they will
still face some issues in the future. Uncontrollable fuel costs remain a
headache, whilst a reinvigorated Ryanair could eventually bring pressure to
bear on the group’s new Vueling business. Moreover, uncertain economic
condition is also the biggest threat for the sustainability of IAG.
How do you compare this merger with the merger of Air France-KLM?
ReplyDeleteIn my opinion, in the merger of Air France-KLM, none of these airlines dominates each other, the size of both companies is well-balanced and both already had huge network worldwide, Hence. it seems like the merger was intended to monopoly the market.
ReplyDeleteIn contrast, British Airways dominates Iberia in term of the size of company, and the merger was intended to expand the network because BA has strong presence in Asia Pacific which is a huge market but Iberia has strong presence in South America.
Lastly, I think AF-KLM able to undergone merger smoothly unlike BA-Iberia because both were on the same size.